“Ik dacht altijd dat seks begon met zijn initiatief en eindigde met zijn orgasme. Blijkt dat er veel meer mogelijk is.”
- Anonieme getuigenis
We denken misschien dat we onze eigen keuzes maken in bed, maar onbewust volgen we vaak een script. De man verleidt, de vrouw beslist. De man wil altijd, de vrouw mag niet te gretig zijn. En seks? Die eindigt meestal als hij klaarkomt.
Klinkt ouderwets? Toch leven veel mensen nog steeds volgens dit scenario. In mijn masterproef onderzocht ik wat dat betekent voor het plezier dat mensen beleven aan seks. De conclusie is duidelijk: wie vasthoudt aan traditionele ideeën over seks, beleeft er minder plezier aan. Wie daarentegen meer gelijke rollen aanneemt en losser en creatiever omspringt met verwachtingen, ervaart meer genot, intimiteit en zelfvertrouwen.
We krijgen van kleins af aan impliciete boodschappen mee over seks: in films, via vriendinnen, uit porno of in de opvoeding. Deze ‘seksuele scripts’ vertellen hoe een seksuele interactie ‘hoort’ te verlopen. En wie afwijkt van het script, voelt zich al snel ‘raar’ of ‘fout’.
Een voorbeeld? Mannen moeten altijd zin hebben en het initiatief nemen. Vrouwen mogen seks willen, maar niet te graag. Dit script zet vrouwen in de rol van “poortwachter” en mannen als “jagers”. Geen wonder dat dit leidt tot spanning, onzekerheid en… minder plezier.
Mijn onderzoek toonde aan dat wanneer deze rollen meer gelijk zijn, wanneer vrouwen even veel initiatief nemen als mannen bijvoorbeeld, het seksueel plezier bij koppels hoger is. Bovendien vond ik dat koppels die flexibel omgaan met seks - die open communiceren en creatief zijn bij seksuele moeilijkheden – ook meer plezier beleven. Niet alleen lichamelijk, maar ook emotioneel. Ze voelen zich zelfverzekerder, meer verbonden en meer op hun gemak.
“Seks is geen verplicht nummer. Het is iets dat je samen maakt.”
- Irena Coetsier, onderzoeker
We noemen dit seksuele scriptflexibiliteit: het vermogen om je aan te passen aan wat er speelt tussen de lakens. Heb je minder zin, een ander verlangen of lukt iets niet? Dan zoek je samen een nieuwe weg. Klinkt eenvoudig, maar het vereist bewustwording en communicatie.
Voor mijn masterproef in Gender & Diversiteit ondervroeg ik ongeveer 500 mensen in een langdurige heteroseksuele relatie. Zij vulden drie wetenschappelijk gevalideerde vragenlijsten in:
De resultaten waren helder. Traditionele ideeën over seks gingen hand in hand met minder plezier, vooral op vlak van zelfeffectiviteit, opwindingsplezier en interactieplezier. Flexibiliteit daarentegen ging samen met meer genot - op bijna alle vlakken.
Veel van de obstakels voor seksueel plezier zitten tussen de oren. Als je gelooft dat “seks pas echt is als het penis-in-vagina is”, dan raak je snel gefrustreerd als dat niet lukt. En als je denkt dat je partner altijd zin moet hebben, dan voelt een ‘nee’ al snel als afwijzing.
Door die vaste verwachtingen los te laten, ontstaat er ruimte voor plezier. Dan wordt seks iets dat je samen vormgeeft - niet iets waar je aan moet voldoen.
Opvallend: in mijn studie bleek het effect van traditionele rollen en flexibiliteit op seksueel plezier gelijk bij vrouwen én mannen. Vrouwen scoorden gemiddeld iets hoger op ‘bonding enjoyment’ (gevoel van verbondenheid tijdens seks), maar verder waren er weinig verschillen.
Dat betekent: de boodschap geldt voor iedereen. Hoe je je ook identificeert, je kan baat hebben bij het doorbreken van seksnormen.
Seksueel plezier is geen luxe of extraatje. Volgens de Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie is het een fundamenteel onderdeel van seksuele gezondheid. Mensen die meer genot ervaren tijdens seks, communiceren beter, voelen zich zelfzekerder en gebruiken vaker bescherming. Seksueel welzijn is dus letterlijk goed voor je gezondheid.
Toch blijven publieke campagnes vaak steken bij "veilig vrijen", zonder aandacht voor plezier, verbondenheid of zelfvertrouwen. Mijn onderzoek toont aan dat meer aandacht voor seksueel scriptdenken broodnodig is. Niet alleen in relaties, maar ook in onderwijs, media en therapie.
Mijn onderzoek focuste op heteroseksuele relaties, omdat traditionele scripts daar het sterkst spelen. Maar natuurlijk zijn deze inzichten ook relevant voor andere vormen van relaties. Queer koppels hebben vaak andere scripts, maar kunnen evengoed last hebben van normen en verwachtingen. Daar ligt een belangrijke piste voor toekomstig onderzoek.
Wie seks beleeft als een toneelstukje, loopt kans op gemiste kansen. Wie het scenario loslaat en samen improviseert, ontdekt vaak meer plezier en meer verbinding.
Goede seks begint niet bij voorspel, maar bij het herschrijven van het script.
- Irena Coetsier, onderzoeker
References
Abramson, P. R., & Pinkerton, S. D. (2002). With pleasure.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195146097.001.0001
Alksnis, C., Desmarais, S., & Wood, E. (1996). Gender differences in scripts for different types of
dates. Sex Roles, 34(5–6), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01547805
Allen, L., & Carmody, M. (2012). ‘Pleasure has no passport’: re-visiting the potential of pleasure in
sexuality education. Sex Education, 12(4), 455–468.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2012.677208
Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2013). A double standard for “Hooking Up”: How far have we come
toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42(5), 1191–1206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006
Anderson, P. B., & Aymami, R. (1993). Reports of female initiation of sexual contact: Male and
female differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22(4), 335–343.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01542122
Anderson, P. B., & Sorensen, W. (1999). Male and female differences in reports of women’s
heterosexual initiation and aggression. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(3), 243–253.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018736326344
Anderson, R. M. (2013). Positive sexuality and its impact on overall well-being.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 56(2), 208–214.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1607-z
Beck, A. M., Robinson, J. W., & Carlson, L. E. (2013). Sexual values as the key to maintaining
Satisfying sex after Prostate Cancer treatment: The Physical Pleasure–Relational Intimacy Model
of Sexual Motivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(8), 1637–1647.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0168-z
Bonell, S., Lee, H., Pearson, S., Harris, E., & Barlow, F. K. (2022). Benevolent Sexism and the
Traditional Sexual Script as Predictors of Sexual Dissatisfaction in Heterosexual Women from the
U.S. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(6), 3063–3070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02318-3
Borgmann, M., Brandner, L. M., D’Urso, D., Gonin-Spahni, S., Znoj, H. J., & Werner, M. A. (2025). A
psychometric study of a trait and state assessment of sexual pleasure – the Amsterdam Sexual
Pleasure Inventory. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–27.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2261439
Bouchard, K. N., Cormier, M., Huberman, J. S., & Rosen, N. O. (2023). Sexual script flexibility and
sexual well-being in long-term couples: a dyadic longitudinal study. The Journal of Sexual
Medicine, 20(7), 945–954. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdad067
Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities: Second Edition. Univ of California Press.
Crutcher, E. E. (2012). The pleasure gap: A Sociological Analysis of Evaluating Female Pleasure in
Pornography.
Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1991). Sexuality and communication in close relationships. Sexuality
in Close Relationships., 93–110. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315807423-10
Darwin, C. (1872). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.2112
41
Dewitte, M., Carvalho, J., Corona, G., Limoncin, E., Pascoal, P., Reisman, Y., & Štulhofer, A. (2020).
Sexual Desire Discrepancy: A position statement of the European Society for Sexual Medicine.
Sexual Medicine, 8(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.02.008
Dey, J., & Shepherd, M. D. (2002). Evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with
diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.4065/77.3.276
Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample
of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. The Journal of Sex
Research, 42(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552268
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2003). The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved
Dispositions versus Social Roles. In The MIT Press eBooks.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2874.003.0015
Emmerink, P. M. J., Van Den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Ter Bogt, T. F. M., & Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2017). A
Scale for the Assessment of Sexual Standards among Youth: Psychometric Properties. Archives
of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1699–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1001-x
Endendijk, J. J., Deković, M., Vossen, H., Van Baar, A. L., & Reitz, E. (2021). Sexual Double
standards: contributions of sexual socialization by parents, peers, and the media. Archives of
Sexual Behavior, 51(3), 1721–1740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02088-4
Exner, T. M., Dworkin, S. L., Hoffman, S., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Beyond the male condom: The
evolution of Gender-Specific HIV Interventions for Women. Annual Review of Sex Research, 14(1),
114–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2003.10559813
Finlay, B., Starnes, C. E., & Alvarez, F. B. (1985). Recent changes in sex-role ideology among
divorced men and women: Some possible causes and implications. Sex Roles, 12(5–6), 637–653.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00288183
Ford, J. V., Vargas, E. C., Finotelli, I., Jr, Fortenberry, J. D., Kismödi, E., Philpott, A., Rubio-Aurioles,
E., & Coleman, E. (2019). Why pleasure matters: its global relevance for sexual health, sexual
rights and wellbeing. International Journal of Sexual Health, 31(3), 217–230.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2019.1654587
Frederick, D. A., St John, H. K., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2017). Differences in orgasm frequency
among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample.
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-z
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1987). The sexual scripting of oral genital contacts. Archives of Sexual
Behavior, 16(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01541838
Galinsky, A. M., & Sonenstein, F. L. (2010). The association between developmental assets and
sexual enjoyment among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(6), 610–615.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.008
Gauvin, S., & Pukall, C. F. (2017). The SexFlex Scale: a measure of sexual script flexibility when
approaching sexual problems in a relationship. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 44(4), 382–397.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2017.1405304
Gianotten, W. L., Alley, J. C., & Diamond, L. M. (2021). The health benefits of sexual expression.
International Journal of Sexual Health, 33(4), 478–493.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.1966564
Gilbert, L. A., & Scher, M. (1999). Gender and sex in counseling and psychotherapy. Google Books.
https://books.google.be/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=KEJMAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR14&…
42
.+A.,+%26+Scher,+M.+(1999).+Gender+and+sex+in+counseling+and+psychotherapy.+Needha
m+Heights,+MA:+Allyn+%26+Bacon+&ots=CWLPgedjVi&sig=x28bBC0LeT5Fodw70SZh12g6Zog
&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Goldey, K. L., Posh, A. R., Bell, S. N., & Van Anders, S. M. (2016). Defining Pleasure: A focus group
study of solitary and partnered sexual pleasure in queer and heterosexual women. Archives of
Sexual Behavior, 45(8), 2137–2154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0704-8
Gruskin, S., & Kismödi, E. (2020). A call for (Renewed) commitment to sexual health, sexual rights,
and sexual pleasure: a matter of Health and Well-Being. American Journal of Public Health,
110(2), 159–160. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2019.305497
Hall, K. S. K. (2019). Cultural differences in the treatment of sex problems. Current Sexual Health
Reports, 11(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00189-9
Harvey, P., Jones, E., & Copulsky, D. (2023). The relational nature of gender, the pervasiveness of
heteronormative sexual scripts, and the impact on sexual pleasure. Archives of Sexual Behavior,
52(3), 1195–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02558-x
Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating
Reliability. But. . .. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
Hendrickx, L., Gijs, L., & Enzlin, P. (2016). Sexual Difficulties and Associated Sexual Distress in
Flanders (Belgium): a Representative Population-Based survey study. The Journal of Sexual
Medicine, 13(4), 650–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.014
Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). An
Event-Level Analysis of the Sexual Characteristics and Composition Among Adults Ages 18 to 59:
Results from a National Probability Sample in the United States. The Journal of Sexual Medicine,
7(Supplement_5), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02020.x
Hull, T. H. (2008). Sexual pleasure and wellbeing. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20(1–2),
133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317610802157234
Hundhammer, T., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). How sex puts you in gendered shoes: Sexuality-priming
leads to gender-based self-perception and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
103(1), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028121
Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2002). Why Some Women Consent to Unwanted Sex With a Dating
Partner: Insights from Attachment Theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 360–370.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00075
Jozkowski, K. N., Sanders, S. A., Rhoads, K., Milhausen, R. R., & Graham, C. A. (2015). Examining
the psychometric properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women
(SESII-W) in a sample of lesbian and bisexual women. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(7),
836–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1066743
Kamen, P. (2000). Her way: Young Women remake the sexual Revolution.
http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA53977074
Kismödi, E., Corona, E., Maticka-Tyndale, E., Rubio-Aurioles, E., & Coleman, E. (2017). Sexual
Rights as Human Rights: A guide for the WAS Declaration of Sexual Rights. International Journal of
Sexual Health, 29(sup1), 1–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2017.1353865
43
Klein, V., Imhoff, R., Reininger, K. M., & Briken, P. (2018). Perceptions of sexual script deviation in
women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-
018-1280-x
Klein, V., Laan, E., Brunner, F., & Briken, P. (2022). Sexual Pleasure Matters (Especially for Women)
— Data from the German Sexuality and Health Survey (GeSiD). Sexuality Research and Social
Policy, 19(4), 1879–1887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00694-y
Kreager, D. A., Staff, J., Gauthier, R., Lefkowitz, E. S., & Feinberg, M. E. (2016). The double standard
at sexual debut: gender, sexual behavior and adolescent peer acceptance. Sex Roles, 75(7–8),
377–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0618-x
Laan, E. T. M., Klein, V., Werner, M. A., Van Lunsen, R. H. W., & Janssen, E. (2021). In Pursuit of
Pleasure: A Biopsychosocial perspective on sexual pleasure and gender. International Journal of
Sexual Health, 33(4), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.1965689
Lai, Y., & Hynie, M. (2010). A tale of two standards: an examination of young adults’ endorsement
of gendered and ageist sexual double standards. Sex Roles, 64(5–6), 360–371.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9896-x
Landers, S., & Kapadia, F. (2020). The Public Health of Pleasure: Going beyond disease Prevention.
American Journal of Public Health, 110(2), 140–141. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2019.305495
LaRossa, R., & Coltrane, S. (1997). Family Man: fatherhood, housework, and gender equity.
Contemporary Sociology a Journal of Reviews, 26(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.2307/2076569
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (2000). The social organization of
sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. University of Chicago Press.
Levant, R. F., Rankin, T. J., Hall, R. J., Smalley, K. B., & Williams, C. M. (2011). Measurement of
nontraditional sexuality in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 283–295.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9793-6
Littleton, H. L., & Axsom, D. (2003). Rape and seduction scripts of University students:
Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape. Sex Roles, 49(9/10), 465–475.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025824505185
Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: bias in the science of evolution. Choice
Reviews Online, 43(01), 43–0301. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-0301
MacCorquodale, P., & DeLamater, J. (1979). Self-Image and premarital sexuality. Journal of
Marriage and Family, 41(2), 327. https://doi.org/10.2307/351700
Marchbank, J., & Letherby, G. (2014). Introduction to gender. In Routledge eBooks.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797236
Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2012). Sexual Scripts among Young
Heterosexually Active Men and Women: Continuity and Change. The Journal of Sex Research,
50(5), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661102
Mathias, J., Anderies, J. M., Baggio, J., Hodbod, J., Huet, S., Janssen, M. A., Milkoreit, M., & Schoon,
M. (2020). Exploring non-linear transition pathways in social-ecological systems. Scientific
Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59713-w
McCormick, N. B. (2010). Sexual scripts: social and therapeutic implications. Sexual &
Relationship Therapy, 25(1), 96–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990903550167
44
McInnis, M. K., & Pukall, C. F. (2022). Sexual script flexibility after a prostate cancer diagnosis:
Implications for sexual satisfaction. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 41(3), 267–276.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2022.2102958
Messner, M. A. (1993). ?Changing men? and feminist politics in the United States. Theory and
Society, 22(5), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00993545
Messner, M. A. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in Movements. SAGE Publications,
Incorporated.
Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4),
477–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2
Metts, S., & Cupach, W. R. (1989). The role of communication in human sexuality. In Human
sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 139–161). K. McKinney & S. Sprecher.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-98766-006
Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual Communication in Interpersonal Contexts: A Script-
Based approach. Annals of the International Communication Association, 19(1), 49–92.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1996.11678928
Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (2002). Reconceptualizing the sexual double standard. Journal of
Psychology & Human Sexuality, 13(2), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1300/j056v13n02_05
Mintz, L. B., & O'Neil, J. M. (1990). Gender roles, sex, and the process of psychotherapy: Many
questions and few answers. Journal of Counseling & Development, 68(4),
381–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb02515.x
Mischel, W. (2015). A social learning view of sex differences in behavior. Gender and Psychology,
108–129. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-16208-007
Mitchell, K. R., Lewis, R., O’Sullivan, L. F., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2021). What is sexual wellbeing and
why does it matter for public health? The Lancet Public Health, 6(8), e608–e613.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00099-2
Morier, D., & Seroy, C. (1994). The effect of interpersonal expectancies on men’s self-presentation
of gender role attitudes to women. Sex Roles, 31(7–8), 493–504.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01544203
Murray, S. H. (2017). Heterosexual Men’s Sexual Desire: Supported by, or Deviating from,
Traditional Masculinity Norms and Sexual Scripts? Sex Roles, 78(1–2), 130–141.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0766-7
Muruthi, B., McCoy, M., Chou, J., & Farnham, A. (2018). Sexual Scripts and Narrative Therapy with
Older Couples. American Journal of Family Therapy, 46(1), 81–95.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2018.1428129
Narvaja, T. (2016). The Failures of Consent: How the (En)gendering of Sexual Scripts and Desire
within Consensual Sex Preserves Rape Culture within the University [University of Washington].
https://digital.lib.washington.edu:443/researchworks/handle/1773/36364
Nobre, P., Gouveia, J. P., & Gomes, F. A. (2003). Sexual Dysfunctional Beliefs Questionnaire: An
instrument to assess sexual dysfunctional beliefs as vulnerability factors to sexual problems.
Sexual & Relationship Therapy, 18(2), 171–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468199031000061281
Ortiz-Torres, B., Williams, S. P., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Urban women’s gender scripts:
Implications for HIV prevention. Culture Health & Sexuality, 5(1), 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713804639
45
O’Suliivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1996). Gender differences in responses to discrepancies in desired
level of sexual intimacy. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8(1–2), 49–67.
https://doi.org/10.1300/j056v08n01_04
O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor
roles in sexual dating interactions. The Journal of Sex Research, 29(3), 435–446.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499209551658
O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1993). Eroding stereotypes: College women’s attempts to influence
reluctant male sexual partners. The Journal of Sex Research, 30(3), 270–282.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499309551711
Palmore, E. B. (1982). Predictors of the longevity difference: A 25-Year Follow-Up. The
Gerontologist, 22(6), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/22.6.513
Papp, L. J., Hagerman, C., Gnoleba, M. A., Erchull, M. J., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., & Robertson,
C. M. (2015). Exploring Perceptions of Slut-Shaming on Facebook: Evidence for a reverse sexual
double standard. Gender Issues, 32(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-014-9133-y
Pascoal, P. M., Sanchez, D. T., Raposo, C. F., & Pechorro, P. (2016). Initial validation of the sexual
pleasure scale in Clinical and Non-Clinical samples of partnered heterosexual people. The
Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13(9), 1408–1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.06.010
Pierce, W. D., & Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. The Canadian Journal of Sociology,
2(3), 321. https://doi.org/10.2307/3340496
Regan, H. (2024). A critical review of sociological research on sexual pleasure. Sociology
Compass, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13205
Reis, E. (2013). Intersex surgeries, circumcision, and the making of “Normal.” In Springer eBooks
(pp. 137–147). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6407-1_10
Rubin, G. S. (2007). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Routledge
eBooks (pp. 166–203). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966105-21
Rutagumirwa, S. K., & Bailey, A. (2017). “The heart desires but the body refuses”: sexual scripts,
older men’s perceptions of sexuality, and implications for their mental and sexual health. Sex
Roles, 78(9–10), 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0822-3
Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing Inequality in the United States:
The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate
relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 168–183.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
Sanchez, D. T., Good, J. J., Kwang, T., & Saltzman, E. (2008). When finding a mate feels urgent.
Social Psychology, 39(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.39.2.90
Sanchez, D. T., Kiefer, A. K., & Ybarra, O. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in Women: Costs for
sexual autonomy and arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 512–524.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282154
Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018). The age of
adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2(3), 223–228.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30022-1
Seal, D. W., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship,
romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture Health & Sexuality, 5(4), 295–319.
https://doi.org/10.1080/136910501171698
46
Seal, D. W., Wagner-Raphael, L. I., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2000). Sex, intimacy, and HIV. Journal of
Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11(4), 51–92. https://doi.org/10.1300/j056v11n04_03
Segal, L. (1994). Straight Sex: Rethinking the Politics of pleasure.
http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA25175223
Segal, L. (2007). Slow motion: Changing Masculinities, Changing Men. Palgrave Macmillan.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual
Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01542219
Soller, B., & Haynie, D. L. (2016). Variation in Sexual Double Standards across Schools.
Sociological Perspectives, 60(4), 702–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121416668865
Szymanski, D. M., & Henrichs-Beck, C. (2013). Exploring Sexual Minority Women’s Experiences of
External and Internalized Heterosexism and Sexism and their Links to Coping and Distress. Sex
Roles, 70(1–2), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0329-5
Van Lunsen, R. H. W., Brauer, M., & Laan, E. (2013). Sex, pleasure, and dyspareunia in liberal
northern Europe. The Cultural Context of Sexual Pleasure and Problems: Psychotherapy With
Diverse Clients, 356–370. https://researchinformation.amsterdamumc.org/en/publications/sexpleasure-
and-dyspareunia-in-liberal-northern-europe
Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2010). Communicating interest in sex: verbal and nonverbal
initiation of sexual activity in young adults’ romantic dating relationships. Archives of Sexual
Behavior, 40(5), 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9663-7
Vigil, K. E., De Jong, D. C., & Poovey, K. N. (2021). Roles of Genital Self-Image, Distraction, and
Anxiety in Women’s Sexual Pleasure: a Preregistered study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47(4),
325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2021.1874581
Wade, L. D., Kremer, E. C., & Brown, J. (2005). The incidental orgasm: the presence of clitoral
knowledge and the absence of orgasm for women. Women & Health, 42(1), 117–138.
https://doi.org/10.1300/j013v42n01_07
Wagner-Raphael, L. I., Seal, D. W., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2001). Close Emotional Relationships with
Women versus Men: A Qualitative Study of 56 Heterosexual Men Living in an Inner-City
Neighborhood. The Journal of Men S Studies, 9(2), 243–256.
https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.0902.243
Ward, L. M., Rosenscruggs, D., & Aguinaldo, E. R. (2022). A Scripted Sexuality: media, gendered
sexual scripts, and their impact on our lives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(4),
369–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221101072
WAS Sexual Health for the Millennium Declaration | World Association for Sexual Health (WAS).
(n.d.). WAS Website. https://www.worldsexualhealth.net/was-sexual-health-for-the-millenniumd…
Werner, M., Borgmann, M., & Laan, E. (2023). Sexual pleasure matters – and how to define and
assess it too. A conceptual framework of sexual pleasure and the sexual response. International
Journal of Sexual Health, 35(3), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2023.2212663
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4),
496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
47
Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Lo, W., & Sanders, S. A. (2018). Are women’s orgasms hindered by
phallocentric imperatives? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(6), 1565–1576.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1149-z
Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000). Application of the Theory of Gender and Power to
examine HIV-Related Exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health
Education & Behavior, 27(5), 539–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700502
World Health Organization: WHO. (n.d.). Gender EURO. Retrieved October 25, 2024, from
https://www.who.int/europe/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1
Yessick, L. R., Gauvin, S. E., Salomons, T. V., & Pukall, C. F. (2022). Pain characteristics, sexual
script flexibility, and penetration control cognitions in those experiencing anodyspareunia.
Psychology and Sexuality, 14(1), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2022.2118069
Zanna, M. P., & Pack, S. J. (1975). On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in
behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(6), 583–591.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90009-8